Saturday, March 23, 2019


  After the mosque shooting in New Zealand the government there passed a law banning all military style semi automatic weapons, all high capacity ammunition magazines, and all parts that allow a weapon to be modified into the type of weapon used in the attack. The New York Times in an article praised New Zealand for only taking six days to pass this law. This reinforces the leftist adage to never let a good crisis go to waste. New Zealand is a country that averages 1.07 gun deaths per 100,000 people a year. Their total population in 2017 was 4.794 million people. Prior to the mosque shootings the worst mass shooting in modern New Zealand history occurred in 1990 at a place called Aramoana township. This was the result of a verbal dispute between two neighbors. Fourteen people, including a police officer, died when David Gray, obviously a nut case, went on a killing spree killing his neighbors and innocent bystanders. In 1992 New Zealand passed a tough gun law as a result of this shooting and tightened restrictions on the ownership of military style semi-automatic weapons. Obviously these laws didn't prevent the mosque shooter from obtaining the weapons he used. So it is logical to take military style semi automatic weapons away from law abiding citizens who had nothing at all to do with the mosque shooting. On top of this the shooter was Australian. A country that has already banned the ownership of guns. The United States by comparison has 10.6 gun deaths per 100,000 out of a total population nearly 330 million people. Honduras had a population of 9.265 million people in 2017 and has the highest homicide rate in the world. Of the 48,094 murders registered in Honduras between 2008 and 2015, 39,111 were committed using a firearm, according to data from the Violence Observatory at the National Autonomous University of Honduras. This amounts to 60.0 deaths per 100,000 population as opposed to 10.6 in America. If you take away gun violence in the big cities that have Democrat dominated governments such as Chicago, where there is strict gun control, and other large cities like Detroit, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Philadelphia just to name a few, America is a pretty safe place when it come to guns. The gun carnage is being caused by criminals and thugs who have relinquished their constitutional right to carry a weapon. The gun control people want law abiding citizens to pay for the sins of these criminals. In my view if you want to bring down America's murder rate end Democrat leadership in the big cities. Create a gun friendly environment for law abiding citizens everywhere. Not only in rural areas but in the urban areas. More guns less crime. All over America police are afraid to do their job anymore and because of eight years of Obama cities are becoming more and more unsafe. This is due to the constant anti-police rhetoric of the Obama years. Blacks came to believe that White police officers put on their uniform everyday with the intention of killing a Black person. A Black person has a greater chance of being struck by lightning than being killed by a White police officer. The leading cause of death for young Black men is to be murdered by another Black man. Young White men they are more likely to die in a car accident.  As a security officer I am seeing this reluctance to act by the police firsthand. A few years ago they wouldn't hesitate to arrest someone that was causing trouble. There is a brazenness among the criminal element because they know things have changed. Nashville police officers are leaving their jobs in droves because of low morale. The city is experiencing unbelievable growth and it's police department is shrinking. Gun violence has soared in the last few years in Nashville. At a time that political correctness is creating an unsafe environment for the average citizen the left continues it's relentless push to take away our guns. The key word in gun control is control. The target is not the gun but the American people. Guns are the only thing that protect the people from tyranny. Without a gun when the thief enters your house and binds you up he not only has it in his power to rob you of your liberty but he also has the power to rob you of your life. It is the same when the government becomes the thief. There is no one to appeal to but God.

Friday, March 22, 2019


Cenk Yygur

  Recently I posted a podcast from a man who calls himself Mr.Reagan. He made the allegation that Alexandria Ocasio Cortez was not a legitimate congressman but an actress chosen for the part. Mr. Reagan's allegations were solid because he provided video evidence that appear to verify his allegations. I am usually very skeptical of conspiracy theories  but everything Mr. Reagan said has the ring of truth and is very logical. In order to confirm the story I called into Steve Gills morning talk show, the Tennessee Star Report, about two weeks ago. I asked him, and his co-host Michael Patrick Leahy if the story was true. In my mind Gill would know because he was a former Republican candidate in Rutherford County and has been involved with the Tennessee Republican Party for years. Gill said that the allegation was absolutely true. He even gave details that Mr Reagan left out. That the casting call was held on Gay street in Knoxville in 2017. She was chosen from among 10,000 applicants. Gill and Leahy also repeated much of the information given in the podcast. The show was up toward a hard break and I was unable to ask my follow-up question. Why are we not hearing about this on Conservative talk radio like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, or Sean Hannity? Or on Fox News for that matter? I totally understand why it wouldn't be covered by the Communist mainstream media. In the last week, however; I have heard that both Rush Limbaugh and Hannity have talked about the scandal but I can't find anything on YouTube or Google to verify this. Since both are heavily into censorship that doesn't surprise me. I did see a reference to Newsweek magazine on Yahoo accusing Hannity of spreading a conspiracy theory about AOC being an actress. This story has frightening implications. Not only was AOC chosen as a congressional candidate but two of the other people who were elected in 2018 were found this way. A woman, that most of you have probably never heard of, Congressman Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts and the infamous Rashida Tlaib of Michigan. You know, the one that wants to impeach the Mother F_ cker Trump. Tlaib, like Ilman Omar is a Muslim and anti semite. A group calling themselves the Justice Democrats ran 70 candidates in 2018 and out of this group only 7 were elected. Omar was one of these 7 but she is not an actor. She was, however; financed by the Justice Democrats. Their goal is to run candidates every two years. According to Cenk Yygur, the creator of the popular left wing podcast, The Young Turks, who was also the driving force in creating this movement called the Justice Democrats, was aiming to win at least 6 congressional races. They won 7 which exceeded his expectations. Yygur wants to unseat establishment Democrats in order to replace them with socialists like AOC. The congressman that AOC defeated, Joe Crowley, had been in Congress for 20 years. It is worth noting that the Young Turks was a movement in Turkey that took over that government in 1911. They were responsible for the Armenian Holocaust which slaughtered over 1.5 million Armenian Christians in 1915. Today many Turks are holocaust deniers. Yygur, who is of Turkish descent, is a holocaust denier and it is interesting that he chose the term The Young Turks for his podcast name. It is my understanding that Yygur is no longer associated directly with the Social Democrats because of statements he has made in the past about women. AOC's brother Gabriel submitted her name to be auditioned for the part of a congressman and she admits this in a video. Alexandra Roja, a high ranking spokesman for the Justice Democrats admits on video that they were looking for someone with star power and this is why they picked AOC. AOC's two handlers are a man from Tennessee named Corbin Trent and her campaign manager named Saikat Chakrabarti. They are advised by the Alinskyite Zach Exley. Another side note about Chakrabarti is that he frequently wears a tee shirt with the likeness of Subhas Chandra Bose, a violent Indian anti - colonialist, socialist who once said that " Our philosophy should be a synthesis between Nazism and Communism". It is obvious that AOC is an actress because she is repeating the same things being said by her handlers. How do we know? Because they are proud of it and their talking points are being filmed. This is why AOC seems to act befuddled when she gets off script and sounds like an ignoramus.  According to the New Yorker magazine the Green New Deal was concocted in a motel room over one weekend and there is no evidence that AOC was even in the room. The reason they picked AOC is because she could be manipulated and was totally unprepared for political office. Her ignorance is a plus for them because she is beholden to her handlers for information. When she strays away from her prepared statements it can be very embarrassing for her. AOC is not the first political puppet of corrupt politicians. There have been corrupt political machines for years. The Tweed Ring in new York, Tammany Hall, the Curley machine in Massachusetts, the Pendergast machine in Missouri and the Crump machine in Tennessee. They all put their candidates in positions of power and have controlled them from behind the scenes. This sort of thing is nothing new. When radical Communists and Fascists do it it becomes downright scary. How do you fight a group of people who have no conscience and no moral limits to their actions? In everything the means justify the end. In true Alinsky style our system is being overwhelmed. This is why we are seeing the push for sixteen year olds to vote, and end to the electoral college, open borders, families of illegal immigrants swarming our borders, term limits on judges, election fraud, welfare fraud, Islamic creep, the Green New Deal, growing deficits, etc.etc.etc. So why do I call them the modern abolitionists? Their goal is the abolition of Capitalism.
Alexandria Cortez

Ayanna Pressley 

 Rashida Tlaib 

Zach Exley

Saikat Chakrabarti

Saikat Chakrabarti's hero Subhas Chandra Bose

Trent Corbin

Alexandra Rojas

Wednesday, March 20, 2019


  Recently a friend, who happens to be a Black female, tried to convince me that I was the beneficiary of White privilege. I can't remember what we were talking about at the time but I passionately replied that that was bull crap. Was there such a thing as White privilege in 1950, the year I was born? Absolutely!!! A better description would be White Male privilege. White males were more privileged than just about everyone when it came to getting a job, or an education. Most White women were stay at home moms and if they did work they were only allowed to work in jobs traditionally set aside for women. Retail, telephone operators, nurses, and teachers for the most part. Black men were lucky if they could find jobs in construction, gardening, restaurant work, such as short order cooks, farming or retail. Black women were usually confined to being maids for the upper middle class and wealthier Whites. There was a Black professional class that was generally confined to serving their Black clientele. Doctor's, lawyers, teachers and the clergy for the most part. I was privileged growing up in the 1950's and early 1960's. My childhood was stereotypical White middle class. The Beaver had nothing on me. I was raised by two loving parents who spoiled me and sheltered me from the world. They taught me great values and I was secure in their love for me. The thing that was constantly drummed into my head was the love of God and country, and a good work ethic. I was taught that America had it's flaws but it was the greatest country in the world. Opportunities abounded in America. I could grow up and become anything that I wanted to be. Even president of the United States some day. I never once, however; heard my parents tell me that I could do these things because I was a White male. If I had been a Black male I could understand it if my parents said something like Greg, you are a Negro and your opportunities are very limited. The best you can hope for is being a laborer for the rest of your life. That is if you are not arrested or killed first. This might have been the message. I wonder what Condeleeza Rice's parents were telling her?  She was born in Birmingham Alabama in 1954. A city that came to be called Bombingham and the home of Bull Connors dogs and fire hoses. Or Colin Powell who was born in 1937. His parents immigrated from the West Indies. Were they crippling Colin by discouraging him or was their message positive about America? We know that Barack Obama was raised hating this country, and himself, but that didn't stop him from rising to the highest office in the land. What about race merchants like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson or Jeremiah Wright? Could they have become millionaires in Russia spreading their hatred over there? I don't think so. Only in a democracy, such as America and Britain could a man like Martin Luther King even had the opportunity to bring about change through the tactic of non violence. Non-violence doesn't work in countries like China, Russia, Saudi-Arabia or Iran. There, you die and are never heard from again. Martin Luther King and Mahatma Ghandi would be quick to tell you the same thing if they were able. The greatest gift that an American parent of any color can give their child is a hope. Larry Elder is a Black Conservative talk show host. He is about my age and will tell you in a heartbeat that there is no such thing as White privilege today. Larry does it by using logic and facts. He tells the story of his father who was forced to leave his dysfunctional Southern family as a child. His father roamed the country as a hobo during the depression. Everywhere his father traveled he encountered racism. His father joined the Marines during WW2 and learned to be a cook. After the war he met his wife in Chattanooga but no one would hire him there. He was familiar with los Angeles and decided that race relations were better there. so he moved there. In L.A. he still couldn't find a job as a cook because he was Black. Eventually he found a job cleaning toilets. Larry said that his father was mean to him and they didn't even speak to each other for years. In later years Larry decided to reconcile with his dad. His father cried as he told him why he was so mean. He was only getting a couple of hours of sleep each day trying to support his family and he was simply exhausted. Larry has such a positive attitude about America because his parents, and especially his father, refused to be bitter. He taught him that life is all about choices and we can choose the attitude in life that makes us better people. Larry is a wealthy and successful man today. My parents influence helped me to survive the trauma of losing them when I was 12 years old in 1963. I was no longer a sheltered, spoiled child after that day. You grow up pretty quick. At no time did I blame God or the gun that ended their lives. I am a rich man today. Not in wealth or possessions, but privileged to have the greatest family in the world and to live in the greatest country on earth, even with it's flaws. Many times I marvel at the fact that I was so lucky to have been born in America. I could just as easily have been born in Russia, China or some dilapidated shack in Haiti. As a parent and as a man I have many flaws. I wish that I had spent more quality time with my children when they were small. I am proudest of the fact, however; that I had a part in raising children who love God, their family, and their country. Just all around good people. Yes, it has been my privilege living in this great country called America..

Friday, March 15, 2019


I will preface my remarks by saying that I abhor the shooting in New Zealand and that the man responsible is nothing but pure evil. Having said this anyone who knows me is aware of the fact that I am not very fond of the Islamic religion. It is dangerous and I believe that we should discourage the growth of Islam in the U.S. In a manifesto released by the shooter he praised President Trump's stand on illegal immigration in the U.S. along with the Norwegian White supremacist Anders Breivik, who murdered 77 people in 2011. Breivik was also an anti-Muslim extremist. I know that the Communist backed mainstream media will have a field day with this one. To me, however; this is the modern day equivalent of John Brown writing a manifesto praising William Lloyd Garrison for his anti-slavery stance. Brown, was a radical abolitionist and was definitely on the moral side of the issue. Slavery was a moral evil that had to be abolished. Killing people and hoping to begin a slave insurrection was not the way to bring about the end of slavery, however. It would take a war and the death of over 750,000 Americans to rid America of it's original sin of slavery. Garrison was opposed to slavery but his purpose was to end slavery through moral persuasion and not through violence. Trump is trying his very best to stop the flow of illegal immigration constitutionally but he is getting zero help. He would never, however; encourage the slaughter of illegal aliens, or Muslims for that matter. The man responsible for this massacre in New Zealand, Brenton Tarrant, and Anders Breivik, are on the right side of the issue as John Brown was. Islam must be stopped from spreading their poisonous doctrine throughout the western world because we are in a fight for our very survival. Like Brown, however; they are going about it all wrong. It must be done legislatively and by the rule of law. Most Muslims are good people and do not deserve to be shot down like dogs while they are at worship. They are following a religion, however: that teaches them to do that very thing to us and even worse. I do not believe in eye for an eye and if we sink to that level, how are we any different than they are? I am very pro-life in my views on abortion but I would never kill an abortion doctor or blow up a clinic to advance my cause. That would only damage the cause which I believe in with all my heart.

Incidents like this gives the so called Democrat Party an excuse to foster the myth that Conservatives are nothing but bigots, racists and xenophobic and our rhetoric spawns these type of events. They tried to blame the bombing of Oklahoma City on Conservative talk show hosts like G. Gordon Liddy and Rush Limbaugh as they do similar events. Nothing was said by them when a well worn and underlined copy of Al Gore's book Earth In The Balance was found in the Una Bombers shack. Or when James Hodgkinsona Bernie Sanders supportershot up Republican softball players in 2017. Like John Brown these type people are not only extremists but nut jobs, regardless of what side of the political fence they fall down on. White supremacists identify more with the left than they do with the right. The modern political system that the shooter, Brenton Tarrant, most admired, according to his manifesto was that of communist China. Tarrant explains that he carried out the attack to show “invaders that our lands will never be their lands” and that they will “never replace our people,” while also accelerating a potential conflict between Western civilization and the Islamic world. “[I carried out] the attack to agitate the political enemies of my own people into action, to cause them to overextend their own hand and experience the eventual and inevitable backlash as a result. "He also hoped to “incite violence, retaliation, and further divide between the European people and the invaders currently occupying European soil.” This is similar to John Brown who wanted to start a slave insurrection and Charles Manson, who wanted to start a race war. Hitler was a socialist and was influenced greatly by Karl Marx. The main reason that Nazi's and Communists fought each other was because Hitler was a National Socialist and loyal to Germany. Marxists, whether they lived in Germany or America, owed their allegiance to Moscow. The left has always tried to identify Hitler as a product of the right but he wasn't. He was more aligned with the left. Muslims are similar in the sense that the Sunni and Shiite sects of Islam believe virtually in the same religious doctrine. The main issue between them is how they determine the line of succession to Mohammad. These two groups have been fighting each other for hundreds of years. Yet every sect of Islam is united in their hatred of the Jews and like Hitler would love to see them destroyed. They helped organize Muslim SS units that fought alongside Hitler in WW2. I would like to know why Democrats are so protective of a religion that hates Jews, kills homosexuals, persecutes and kills women. This is why David Duke recently endorsed Ilhan Omar because of her anti-semitism. Richard Spencer, who organized the White supremacist march in Charlottesville Virginia is more in line with the left in his political views than he is with the right. Considering the history of the Democrat Party regarding Indian removal, slavery, lynching, and Jim Crow they have no moral right to link Trump to this massacre in New Zealand any more than the South would have a right to link William Lloyd Garrison with John Brown.

Wednesday, March 13, 2019


  For years now I have been reminded by my Christian relatives and friends that I shouldn't worry so much about this world and what happens because everything is in God's hands. I agree with this thinking to a point. Ultimately it is what sustains me in the end. Sometimes, however; I suspect that many Christians say this in order to justify their own apathy. If all Christian's voted, and made their impact felt in the halls of government, maybe the left would not be making such headway in the world and evil would not triumph as easily. We forget that many Ivy League universities and others across the country were originally founded to train ministers. Most are Communist reeducation centers today. Until the 1947 Everson vs. the Board of education ruling of 1947 Christianity had a huge impact on our leaders, government, schools and every aspect of society. The Everson ruling has left the impression with most Americans that there is such a thing as a separation of church and state. There is no such animal. Praying in school, at football games, having Bible readings in school, putting up a nativity scene on a courthouse lawn, or having the Ten Commandments in a court house, or placing a cross on public land does not constitute the establishment of religion.  As a student of history I can see Gods imprint on it. George Washington recklessly exposed himself to danger during the French & Indian War and later during the American Revolution but was never injured. During Braddock's ambush and defeat he was the only Officer that survived unhurt and had numerous bullet holes in his uniform but got through the battle without a scratch. Even the Indians acknowledged that he had some sort of supernatural protection. They targeted him for death and could not kill him. In my view America owes it's existence to Washington. I can cite.many examples of how God might have interjected himself into history. When  I see injustice and people not being held accountable here in this world I am comforted by the knowledge that they will receive justice in the next at the hands of the true judge, Jesus Christ. Being human I would like to see to see the innocent go free and the true criminals pay here on earth though. There is nothing wrong with this attitude. Going even further, just like Jesus, I take no pleasure in the destruction of the wicked. I prefer redemption when it is based on true repentance. If you are sorry for your sins and not just for the fact that you got caught.. It is a valid question. To what extent should a Christian involve themselves in worldly affairs and the direction of their country? Because many Christians believe that we are in the last days they think that there is nothing that they can do to alter events or slow things down. If you believe the prophecy given by Daniel in the Book of Daniel, chapter 2, you will know beyond a shadow of a doubt that we are in the last days. According to that prophecy the Founding Fathers were also living in the last days. A group of Christians called the Millerites, were convinced that the Lord was coming back on October 22, 1844, but it did not happen. Many had even sold off all of their earthly possessions in preparation. Although many of the Founding Fathers were deists, many were fundamental Christians. Even the deists had great respect for religion and acknowledged that God granted inalienable rights to every American. Rights that the state could not take away. I am glad that our Christian Founding Fathers did not give in to the same view of  many modern day Christian's. They stood up to the greatest military power on the face of the earth. God stood by their side and as a result they prevailed. The Founding Father's could just as easily have said, I will do nothing because God will take care of me. No sweat, he has my back. God expects us to do all we can for ourselves and he will then have our back. It was their duty to throw off a tyrannical government and as history testifies God was there to help them finish the job.